Slumping economy sending more seniors back to work

By SHELLY BIRKELO ( Contact )   Wednesday, Nov. 19, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Podcast Episode


More and more senior citizens are finding themselves back in the workforce. Kyle Geissler reports.

RSS   

PhotoVideo


As part of his job as a valet parking attendant at Den Riverview, Chuck Rote also serves as an unofficial greeter of sorts when there are no other duties for him.  After more than 35 years in a factory job, Rote enjoys his interactions with 'hundreds of people' a day.

As part of his job as a valet parking attendant at Den Riverview, Chuck Rote also serves as an unofficial greeter of sorts when there are no other duties for him. After more than 35 years in a factory job, Rote enjoys his interactions with 'hundreds of people' a day.

PhotoVideo


Bob Lindemann delivers parts for a beloit auto dealer.  Lindemann retired in 1995 and says the extra income allows he and his wife to have a fw extras in their lives.

Bob Lindemann delivers parts for a beloit auto dealer. Lindemann retired in 1995 and says the extra income allows he and his wife to have a fw extras in their lives.

— Arlene Perkins, Chuck Rote and Bob Lindemann are not alone.

They are among a growing number of workers 65 and older. All three returned to work primarily to pay for Medicare supplement insurance.

The slumping economy has prompted many seniors to seek employment to help pay for everyday living, too.

Since January, the number of workers 65 and older has increased nationwide by 434,000, according to Experience Works, a nonprofit organization that provides training and employment services for low-income older workers.

Rote, 68, was six years from being eligible for Medicare—a federal program that pays for certain health care expenses for people 65 and older—when the company he had worked at for 37 years closed.

Rote received some severance pay, but he lost his health insurance. The buyer of the company where Rote and his wife had worked offered new health insurance, but it was too expensive, he said.

So Rote worked 2 1/2 years as a parts runner for an international trucking company before becoming a valet parking attendant at Dean Riverview Clinic in 2002.

Although Rote and his wife now both are on Medicare, his income helps pay for supplement insurance costs that he said has been increasing 15 to 20 percent every year.

"It's really been a blessing for me to find a job like this without the physical labor," Rote said, while working at the north entrance of the local medical facility.

Bob Lindemann, 75, Janesville, was a printer for more than four decades until he retired in 1995. He had health insurance coverage through his wife, who worked for an area school district. But when she retired, the couple found they couldn't afford health insurance.

So Lindemann went to work part-time in the late 1990s, delivering parts for Bud Weiser Chevrolet-Cadillac, Beloit.

His wages are enough now, he said, "so we can afford supplement insurance and do things we couldn't do before like a little traveling," he said.

Arlene Perkins, 71, also is a part-time valet parking attendant at Dean Riverview Clinic. The money she makes—her only income besides Social Security—helps pay for supplement health insurance, property taxes on the home she has owned for over 40 years, homeowners' and car insurance and every day living expenses.

"Sometimes it's pretty rough," she said.

She worked for more than 30 years at Cedar Crest Health Center. Her husband of 16 years died when he was 38, three months before he qualified for a pension at a Beloit Corp. She had to support four young children.

Perkins is grateful for her job and thankful she doesn't have a family to feed with the increasing cost of groceries.

"It's not a big-paying job, but without it, it would be very difficult to make ends meet. I'm not able to go out as much as I did the last couple years with the increasing cost of everything. I don't have the money to do it," she said.

Lindemann said that without part-time income he and his wife would be living strictly on their Social Security and her pension.

"It would be tough to afford, keep the supplement insurance, and we'd really have to watch our expenses," he said.

Rote said his part-time income gives him and his wife the opportunity to travel. They recently bought a new car.

Otherwise, he said, "we wouldn't be able to afford these things."

Perkins, Lindemann and Rote all enjoy what they do.

"The guys I work with are great, and the people I meet are friendly," Lindemann said.

"Dean is a good company to work for. My fellow workers are very nice to work with," Perkins said.

Rote gets satisfaction from working and helping others. He said it makes him feel like he's making a difference.

All three say they will continue to work, at least for a while.

Rote sees himself retiring in a few years, he said.

"I'm going to do it until I can't anymore," Lindemann said.

"I will as long as I can unless my health prevents me from working," Perkins said. "But I hope not because I think the cost of things will continue to go up."

ELDER ADVICE

Tips for older job seekers:

Give it some punch—Start your resume with a tag line that emphasizes your desired outcome in your new position.

Stick to the core—List your accomplishments and experience from your work history in terms of core competencies related to the position you seek, not based upon chronological order. The biggest error made by many older workers is to list all of their duties and responsibilities over the years, even those that have no relevance to the position sought.

Keep it brief—Your resume should be no longer than two pages. Arrange your accomplishments in bulleted action items, not paragraphs. References do not belong in a resume; employers will ask for those in their application or at the time of the interview.

Leave it out—As an older worker, you should de-emphasize dates and years in your resume by omitting dates of education, leaving out earliest jobs and inserting time frames only for relevant past work experience.

Accentuate the positives—Emphasize the positive attributes of your age and experience including your accumulated experience, strong work ethic, ability to make a contribution immediately, and your familiarity with relevant computer software and other technology.

Source: Experience Works, a nonprofit organization that provides training and employment services for low-income older workers.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(8)
keithrg13
Nov 19, 2008 at 7:43 p.m.
Suggest removal

As usual, the discussion has digressed to "Right" versus "Left." The theme of the article however is, people over 65 having to work. The article is succinct in its theme.

Note however that the job examples in the article are not what could be defined as head of household jobs. Considering the current economic insanity, I guess anyone should be glad to have any job at all - a sad commentary.

In a perfect world, if the writer had more time and space, what is missing from this article is all the people over 65 whose bodies are broken and they are unable to work even if there is an extra job out there. Also missing is all the people 50 and over who are pushed out of their jobs or what is left of their jobs. That trend started long before the economy collapsed - even back during Clinton and before. Try finding a meaningful job after you are 50, even with a recent retooled college degree. Another sad commentary about our situation.

Also missing is the reality that if people are forced to work until they are 100, in an imploded economy they are in compitition with teenagers trying to find work.

Also interesting is the "leave it out" advice for older job seekers. It seems the advice in that section is for older applicants to lie about their age by omision. - nice society we live in that someone must try to trick an employer into looking at a resume by playing younger than one really is.

Finally, the overriding conclusion to this humble story is the odious conclusion that if you are old in this society now, you can expect a struggle until you die - I think we are all in big trouble and it "ain't" going to be fixed anytime soon.

Bob Keith
cooldadiomedia.com

ski1357
Nov 19, 2008 at 1:14 p.m.
Suggest removal

Yes, the Republicans were pushing for the option for people to have their Social Security taxes put into a 401k type savings that would invest that money into stock. This was because the SS system we have now is not solvent. Hindsight being 20/20, its a bad idea knowing what the market is doing now. This would be a bad idea for people close to retirement to CHOOSE to have their SS taxes put into that system. It was not a mandated system, people could keep their part going into the same flawed system. Some people also forget that the Republicans did not push for the loose oversight that caused this mess in the first place, it was Nancy Pelosi and Barney Frank!!

fattigman
Nov 19, 2008 at 12:17 p.m.
Suggest removal

jd1965 -- No, the facts are clear. Bush & the Republicans were pushing for privatization of Social Security. Think about that, and ask yourself if the Republicans were looking out for the little guy while they slowly bled the economy for the benefits of their big business buddies.

jd1965
Nov 19, 2008 at 12:02 p.m.
Suggest removal

Janesvillean, that is a ridiculous statement. How do attitudes like yours contribute to the coming together of our nation?
Paul Ryan's proposals are designed to increase the life of the Social Security trust fund, which, among other things, stopped the annual draining of the surplus fund, replacing them with worthless IOU's.
The mischaracterization of Republicans wanting to put our Social Security in the stock market is just plain wrong, and by perpetuating that myth you continue to scare seniors into voting democrat. This same tactic is also applied to stem cell research, which democrats have portrayed all republicans as being against, which is a flat out lie. Again, as long as it gets you the votes, truth be damned.

janesvillean
Nov 19, 2008 at 11:22 a.m.
Suggest removal

The private accounts plan would have brought Social Security to insolvency faster. To the Republicans, remember, that's a GOOD thing.

ski1357
Nov 19, 2008 at 10:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

biggirl,

That plan would have been voluntary. Most people close to retirement probably would not have moved thier SS benefit money to the market. It was not meant to be a madatory program. Get your facts straight.

biggirl
Nov 19, 2008 at 10:16 a.m.
Suggest removal

Seniors should thank their lucky stars that Ryan and Bush didn't get their way and privatize Social Security. Can you imagine if our benefits were tied to the market?

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT