Staff, security, experience among concerns
JANESVILLE Besides the general concern expressed by a Madison school principal, several other issues were raised in a court hearing Tuesday in which a conditional-release plan for Mark Staskal was approved.
Staskal, 44, has lived primarily at Mendota Mental Health Institute in Madison since he was found not guilty by reason of mental disease of the 1984 murder of his younger sister, Marcy, in Milton.
In about two weeks, Staskal is expected to move to Brighter Life Living, an adult group home at 924 E. Mifflin St., Madison.
Through questions and statements, Ray Jablonksi, a Rock County assistant district attorney, and Marc McCrory, an attorney representing Staskal’s parents, Redgie and Melly Staskal of Milton, expressed doubts about the conditional-release plan developed under the auspices of the Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services.
Their concerns included:
-- Experience and education: Glenn Larson, the state’s conditional-release program manager, said Jason Standish, the group home owner had a master’s degree in social work. But Standish said he is a high school graduate with no formal education in social work or psychology. He said his primary field is electronics, which he learned on the job.
Standish said he has been “working in mental health for 12 years” through his operation of group homes.
Standish said his girlfriend also lives at the group home and will receive her master’s degree in social work this weekend.
-- Staff: Under the conditional release plan, the group home is required to have one awake staff member on site for every three residents around the clock. Additional staff members still are being hired and trained “to deal with Mr. Staskal’s specific needs,” Larson said.
McCrory noted that Staskal’s monitors will be people not yet or recently hired and unknown to the state.
Larson said the new staffers all will be college graduates who will be trained to handle Staskal and emergency situations.
“You don’t know if they’ve been hired,” McCrory said.
“I don’t know if they’ve been hired or are being trained,” Larson acknowledged.
n Residents: Licensed for four residents, the group home now has three. One of them lives at the group home under a conditional-release plan because he was found not guilty of some crime by reason of mental disease. Neither the resident nor his crime was identified.
Standish said the most serious crime a resident of his group homes had committed was attempted murder.
-- Medication monitoring: Under questioning, Tom Niman, investigator for the Rock County District Attorney’s Office, said he was told medication at the group home was kept in a locked drawer. But the drawer was not locked when he visited, Niman said, and when Standish produced the medication, it was from a small, lockable metal box in the drawer.
-- Security: “I didn’t see any security,” Niman said. “I noticed there was nothing on the windows.”
A key to the house was hung in plain view outside because Standish’s girlfriend had occasionally locked herself out, Niman said.
-- Out-of-home excursions: For at least the first 30 days, Staskal will be accompanied by a staff member if he ventures out into the community.
“The need for this escort will be reassessed at the end of the 30 days,” according to the release plan.
Staskal has been living under less-restrictive conditions at Mendota for 14 years and could have walked away at any time, Larson said, but Staskal has complied with all rules.
May 15, 2008 at 3:06 a.m.
Suggest removal
SEE: EAU CLAIRE!! END QUOTE.... :( I agree, IF it's ALL ABOUT MONEY...Let's hold a FUNDRAISER, PLEASE!!!!! (MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL!!! (..ISN'T IT?!)
May 14, 2008 at 10:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
I'm for people being able to live in the least restrictive environment, but is this really a wise choice?
Even with new staff being hired, they have to deal with the new agency AND a mentally ill murderer.
I've worked with former snipers that have varying mental illnesses and it freaked me out. I have a social work degree as well.
AND it's that close to a school. As an adult, I wouldn't want to even drive by the house.
I believe that, despite it being more expensive, Mendota may be the proper place for this individual. By law, they can restrain him if need be. Most group homes that I am aware of cannot restrain clients without going through at least 6 months of initial paperwork.
For being such a conservative state, this decision is way too liberal, even for a very liberal, client-based state.
May 14, 2008 at 3:32 p.m.
Suggest removal
It probably has something to do with money and the cost of the care...
once again, the almighty dollar speaks, but dead people can't...
May 14, 2008 at 3:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
what is the reason for not keeping him in Mendota, since he has adjusted to the routine and is comfortable, has not had violent outbursts (like he had while in the other group home) and has the doctors and security to keep Mark AND the community safer???
Why the need for a change??
May 14, 2008 at 3:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
Like I mentioned earlier, I really hope judge Byron knows what he is doing in this case. Would he want his children or grandchildren walking past this man's house everyday to and from school???? I really DOUBT it!!!!
I hope it works, but I can sense trouble- and it is not going to be good!!!!!!
May 14, 2008 at 12:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
sounds like the perfect recipe for disaster!
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.