Long-time auto town successful in altering automaker’s course
JANESVILLE Lansing Mayor Dave Hollister wasn’t asked if he wanted the good news or bad news first.
General Motors officials made Hollister smile in 1996 when they told him they’d be building the new Oldsmobile Alero at the Lansing, Mich., assembly plant.
Then the bad news: When Alero production ended in 2004, GM’s presence in Lansing would end, too.
“I thought, ‘Wow, what in the world am I going to do with this,’” said Hollister, who served as Lansing’s mayor from 1993 to 2003.
What he did was put together a team that convinced GM officials not to abandon Lansing. GM built and opened the $560 million Lansing Grand River plant in 2001 and the $1 billion Lansing Delta Township plant in 2006.
The two plants are the newest in GM’s stable.
Now that GM has said it will close its Janesville plant by 2010 at the latest, the community finds itself in a predicament similar to the one Lansing faced more than 10 years ago.
Granted, the auto industry has changed dramatically:
-- Big trucks such as those that Janesville plant is tooled to build have fallen out of favor with consumers.
-- GM has far more capacity than it needs.
-- GM’s balance sheet says it’s in no position to build new plants or retool existing facilities.
And beyond that, Janesville has long been considered a GM outpost far from GM’s preferred network of suppliers, distributors and decision makers.
Even so, Janesville should not give up hope, said David Cole, chairman of the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Mich.
“Don’t just accept that this has happened and we’re all gonna die.
“Lansing was a very different situation in a very different time, but Janesville could be like Lansing with a new product or a new plant,” Cole said.
War room
Hollister visited Toledo, Ohio, where Chrysler had reversed its decision to close a Jeep facility.
“The takeaway was that we needed a proactive, well-organized team with engineers leading the effort,” Hollister said. “GM doesn’t speak political language at all. They speak engineering, so we had to talk the language they understand.”
Hollister formed a “Keep GM” team of about 100 people who represented all facets of the community.
A smaller operating group met every couple of weeks.
Hollister chaired an even smaller group, a quick response team of eight to 10 people. He described it as a one-stop problem-solving operation capable of handling any issue GM threw its way.
“We had a war room that no one else had access to,” he said. “We had maps all over the walls, we knew every GM officer, and we gathered a lot of information.
“We knew what the hell we were doing.”
The team capitalized on the track record of the local GM workforce and the positive relationship between the local union and company management.
“The thing was not for me to take a political approach,” he said. “I had to represent the collective thinking of the entire region and keep the key players together.
“We didn’t do anything without first checking with labor, checking with the banks, checking with the council, checking with everyone.”
In a nutshell, Hollister said, the team was able to put aside political squabbling and turn a situation that looked hopeless into one of civic pride.
The schools
Concerned that Lansing’s schools weren’t producing the best workforce they could, the team developed strategies to improve the K-12 education system. More than 1,100 volunteers—including the mayor—spent an hour a week for six years helping kids improve their reading skills.
“We decided we would not tolerate dropouts, and one way to achieve that was to get the schools to stop advancing third graders to fourth grade when they couldn’t read,” Hollister said. “We raised reading levels pretty dramatically and sent the message to GM that we were concerned about our workforce and were doing something about it.”
When it was time to launch the new Alero, the Lansing plant did so on its second shift to show GM that even its younger, less-experienced workers were capable of such an important task.
The launch went so well that the plant won a $25,000 award.
“Instead of buying shirts and having a weenie roast, the plant manager used the money to set up a scholarship fund,” said Hollister, who bought the first Alero off the line and the next 12 for members of his cabinet.
“Some of these cabinet members were used to driving Cadillacs and Lincolns. I said, ‘To hell with that. We’ll all drive Aleros and send another message to GM.’”
‘Keep GM’
Knowing that GM officials would be routine visitors to Lansing, the team plastered its “Keep GM” logo on billboards, bumper stickers and auto dealership advertising. It made up a series of awards—the “Award for Progressive Leadership,” for example—that were bestowed upon GM officials at every turn.
“We wined and dined them and did whatever it took to let them know what we were doing in Lansing,” said Hollister, who went on to serve as director of Michigan’s Department of Labor and Economic Growth and now runs an economic development organization.
It worked, at least to the point that when GM wanted to build a new plant to produce Cadillacs, it invited Lansing to submit a proposal.
GM said it wanted 200 acres. To accommodate that, Hollister figured he’d have to knock down neighborhoods or tear up golf courses.
Instead, the engineering members of his team reconfigured the blueprints for GM’s ultra high-tech “Blue Macaw” plant in Brazil to replicate it in an 80-acre parcel in Lansing.
“We went to GM and said, ‘We know this is not what you asked for, but we have a plan to redevelop your site, a site you’ll never sell because it’s so contaminated,’” Hollister said.
GM officials were impressed, but said the new plant would be serviced by up to 1,000 trucks a day on a tight schedule.
Lansing’s infrastructure needed dramatic changes, including moving an expressway that ran through the heart of town.
“They said that if we could handle infrastructure, they’d consider it,” Hollister said. “On a handshake deal, I said I’d make a run at it.”
He and the team did, and the new Grand River plant is now building three Cadillac models.
GM then approached Lansing with a need for a state-of-the-art plant that would ultimately build the popular Buick Enclave, GMC Acadia and Saturn Outlook crossovers.
Lansing didn’t have that kind of acreage, so Hollister turned to his regional teammates to site the plant in Delta Township, about 10 miles outside Lansing.
“We jumped through lots and lots of hoops over the years,” he said. “Our quick response team became GM’s problem solver. (GM Chairman Rick) Wagoner said that our committee knew more about his business than his own people.
“We were that deeply engaged. It can be done.”

Jun 29, 2008 at 5:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
I've heard from many folks (both Union and elected city and state officials) that GM did go to the State of Wisconsin in hopes of landing a deal (price per acre, tax incentives, grants, etc) in order to build a new plant in Southern Wisconsin. My understanding and impression of those talks came down to this phrase: "Hit the road, Jack."
Jun 23, 2008 at 1:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Posted on June 9 at 10:50 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
The best that we can hope for would be to build a NEW plant, not for General Motors to retool. The cost to retool an old plant of this size would be staggering. It is better to build new and have a flexible, lean and state of the art facilty than have an old facilty with not the proper layout to produce with efficiency.
With regards to the Lansing, MI comment in the article, Lansing Car Assembly has been razed. Parts of the Chassis plant was razed and Lansing Grand River Assembly (Cadillac) was built on that site. The old Fisher Body and Durant plant was just demolished this year. The stamping plant is set to begin demo this year. The Lansing Craft Center (niche vehicles EV1, SSR and Cadillac Eldorado)has also been razed. Lansing Delta Township Assembly(Acadia, Enclave, Outlook) also has a stamping plant for the vehicles built at both Lansing Plants.
Wisconsin, Rock County leaders and UAW Local 95 need to lobby General Motors to build their next car plant in Rock County. General Motors will no doubt need more small/mini car capacity in North America. Why not have them locate it in Janesville. Build it right off I-90.
On City grapples with possible uses of mammoth GM facility
Jun 23, 2008 at 1:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
Kinda like the posts I made earlier this month.....
Posted on June 4 at 8:30 a.m. ( Suggest removal )
I see a lot of comments about trying to convince General Motors to place a new product line in Janesville Assembly. This will not happen. It would be cheaper for General Motors to build a completely new assembly plant in the area rather than re-tool the current one. A new paint shop and body shop are the most expensive parts of the plant. The current layout of Janesville Assembly is outdated and not a flexible plant to capable of building multiple lines. I think the Governor, Janesville City Management, Beloit City Management, UAW Local 95 and General Motors need sit down and hammer out a deal and what it will take for the corporation to build a new plant in Rock County. There is plenty of land on the I-90 corridor between Janesville and Beloit that would be attractive to GM. Still has easy access to rail lines, easier for trucks and even the best workfoce.
Wisconsin and Local 95 leaders should also be meeting with the leaders of Lansing, MI. Lansing is the home of the two newest GM plants in the United States. Before Janesville had the oldest GM plant in the world, this title belonged to Lansing (Lansing Chassis and Lansing Body). Once GM decided to shutter their oldest complex, the UAW, local Government and GM got together to hammer out a deal to bring car production to Lansing for another 100 years. Lansing now has Lansing Grand River Assembly (2001) and Lansing Delta Township Assembly(2006).
A new local competitive operating agreement should be the backbone of these discussions. The Janesville area already has the best workforce in General Motors' stable. The leaders should also petition for a new stamping plant adjacent to the assembly plant. Possibly even an engine and transmission plant to complete the world-class complex.
No doubt, if the current leaders come up with a nice package, General Motors would be hard to refuse the deal since they will inevitably need more small car production capacity in North America as the economy moves away from truck-based vehicles. Right now, GM only has Lordstown, Ramos Arizpe, San Luis Potosi and Hamtramck (Chevy Volt 2010) as their small car plant capacity in North America. (I did not count the plants making midsize vehicles such as the Malibu.) The corporation WILL need to have a new plant to keep up with the demand of small and compact cars.
Area Leaders - please come together and start the framework to a NEW plant in Rock County.
Jun 22, 2008 at 3:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
I understand that GM is shifting to more stamping plants for car/truck frames. Couldn't Janesville get a stamping plant?
Jun 22, 2008 at 12:52 p.m.
Suggest removal
Go GM Janesville! Work with Beloit AND Lansing, MI!
If you want to keep it a GM town, you must set forth the effort.
Go Ford!!
Jun 22, 2008 at 5:52 a.m.
Suggest removal
This is they way everyone at the plant needs to think. Don't just accept defeat. Fight for everything you have. It's been proven by Lansing that it can work. I'm not a GM worker but I would be sad to see it go. I'd really like to see what a 100 GM employees and Janesville citizens could do together if they were really passionate about this.
Jun 22, 2008 at 12:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
Thumbs up on this one Gazette, for pointing out what we can do, at least for the time being, to help give Janesville a second thought. We have several things that favor us. For example, unlike Lansing, we have plenty of acreage and not far from the current GM location. In addition, all of our land is located near major highways. Moreover, Janesville has an outstanding location near several major cities regardless of which location GM should use (either current or new). Granted, tax incentives can be put on the table as well as possible land deals. However, our biggest obstacle is in our budget. Neither Janesville as a city, nor Wisconsin as a whole is in a good position to give GM much in the way of financial assistance. As a result, we must rely on what we do have, which is a great location and an excellent (despite what some believe) workforce. The GM Janesville workforce has consistently provided GM with high quality products in a timely matter ranking in the top five of all GM plants. I can tell those who may doubt our workforce, that this recent slew of bad news has put many people back into reality. Even though we have a good workforce, sometimes we need a reality check and I think we’ve all had that in a big way. As a result, any efforts to sway GM by Janesville or Wisconsin representatives would be met with an eager workforce that would step up to any challenge. Although I still think it’s important to further diversify our economy, right now we have a qualified workforce many of whom have a long history including generations of family members that have put blood, sweat, and tears into nuts, bolts, and gears.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.