Doyle vows to fight to keep plant open
Photo
Brad Dutcher, UAW Local 95 president-elect, speaks to politicians, union members and the media during a press conference at the United Auto Workers Local 95 Hall in Janesville on Tuesday. Union, local and state officials now face the daunting task of doing what they can for the hundreds of workers who will lose their jobs with the closing of the GM assembly plant in Janesville.
Photo
JANESVILLE Gov. Jim Doyle didn’t appear ready Tuesday to accept GM’s corporate line that it’s “highly unlikely” a new product would be introduced in Janesville.
“We will do whatever we can with GM or anywhere to try and make that happen,” Doyle said at the United Auto Workers Local 95 Hall.
He will discuss with GM options to keep the assembly plant in Janesville open.
“It’s the first day we’ve had to sort of absorb all of this. I guess, right now, I’m sort of sticking with the fighting spirit of these guys, and that’s where I want to be,” Doyle said, referring to the line of UAW officials behind him.
An emotional Brad Dutcher, UAW president elect, said the union would work to bring a more fuel-efficient product to the plant.
“We are committed to leaving no stone unturned,” said Dutcher, who has worked at the plant for 23 years. “We will exhaust every available avenue in an attempt to secure a future for our community.”
He predicted the closing would devastate the community but said delaying the closing to 2010 provides time to prepare, although the market could dictate the plant close sooner. While he didn’t want to provide false hope, Dutcher said he did not want union members to think the closing is a done deal for union leadership.
Doyle said the top-notch workers in Janesville are the heart and soul of Wisconsin and did nothing wrong to prompt GM’s announcement to close the plant by 2010.
“Everybody here did everything right,” he said to about 20 television crews from Chicago to Green Bay and many more photographers and print reporters.
Doyle recalled his many enjoyable plant visits and said today’s news was a kick in the gut and in many ways “like hearing about a death in the family.”
The governor blamed GM’s slow reaction to rising gas prices and said he wished top executives would have planned better.
State and local government will work with affected families to make sure they “land on their feet,” Doyle said.
A visibly bitter Doyle said GM gave him no indications the announcement was coming and touted Sen. Barack Obama’s plant visit earlier this year.
Saying “if”—not “when”—GM closes in Janesville, Doyle said the state would do what it can to recover as much money from incentives and grants given to GM.
State and local government has contributed $10 million in state training grants and an $8 million grant to improve truck access between Interstate 90/39 and the GM plant.
“I think we were on pretty good footing at that point,” Doyle said referencing the training grant. “Obviously, we made that investment for the purpose to try and make sure we retain these good jobs for people.”
Doyle reiterated he hoped to retain the good jobs and not worry about recovering that money.
“We’re going to do what we can to get the state’s money back,” he said.
Dean moving ahead with hospital plans
Despite the planned closure of the General Motors assembly plant in Janesville, officials in Madison said Tuesday that they still plan to build a $140 million hospital and medical complex in Janesville.
Mary Starmann-Harrison of SSM Health Care of Wisconsin and Craig Samitt of Dean Health System said their thoughts are with those affected by GM’s decision.
“Our commitment to the Janesville area remains firm, and we are moving forward with our plans to build a new hospital and physician office complex,” they said in a joint statement.
“The decision to build these facilities took many factors into consideration, including the projected need for more beds in the area by the year 2011, the desire of Janesville residents for a choice in hospital care close to home and the possibility of potential changes in major employer operations. We look forward to continuing to meet the healthcare needs of the Janesville community.”


Jun 5, 2008 at 5:47 p.m.
Suggest removal
R1234:
The preferred stock is down about the same as the common. You are correct that the upper echelon people get the preferred shares, but the only advantages are in voting rights, and dividends (if one were to figure in the dividends, the stock value would be down in the 65% range over the past 10 years, and not the 80% that my initial post sited; my mistake on that one). The other advantage in preferred shares would be if GM does go bankrupt (which actually is a possibility) the preferred shareholder get paid out from all GM's assets that are liquidized, while the common shareholders normally forfeit all value of the stock to pay off creditors. Hence the stock is worthless.
Many of the executives in a big company like GM, get all sorts of stock options, where they can exercise the options when the stock reaches a certain point. Many times they also have the option of converting preferred shares to common shares. All sorts of games go on in companies the size of GM. The only real people who have made money off GM stock, however; are your shorters and put option players. As doing that strategy lets you cash in when a stock declines in value.
Jun 5, 2008 at 12:14 p.m.
Suggest removal
TCB--what do you mean by "Wisconsin is a forced union state"?? I've never heard that term before.
Jun 5, 2008 at 8:10 a.m.
Suggest removal
Yes, Kiowamohican, common stock is down but what is GM's Preferred stock doing? I have no idea but it usually pays very much better than common stock and is the stock which is held by the upper eschelon and the monied people. Its common shares have been going down since 1982 and has really never recovered.
Jun 5, 2008 at 6:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
It is a sad day for all who's jobs are connected to the closing of the GM plant in Janesville. I have been reading all the rhetoric about the government officials and the corperate officers of GM and how could they do this to us. I have not heard or seen any offering by the UAW and its leadership. Where is a concession offer from this large union that represents auto workers across this nation? A slightly lower paying job per hour is better than no job at all!!!! A $10.00 per hour cut in pay per person at the plant would produce about $62 Million dollars in savings per year for the plant in Janesville. Mulitply that by all the plants that GM operates and the company may again become profitable. I hope that the UAW leadership can become creative thinkers and make some innovative offers to GM management that can entice them to consider some alternatives.
Jun 5, 2008 at 3:49 a.m.
Suggest removal
R1234: Some good points, but you are wrong about GM shareholders reaping profits. GM has been operating HEAVILY in the red, and their stock is down almost 80% now, over a 10 year span (with no splits)! Talk about one of the worse investments one could possibly be in. $1,000 invested 10 years ago, would now be worth about $220.
.
It's easy to pass around the blame, but this is the combination of many factors at work. ALL the US auto makers are in MAJOR trouble. It would be no surprise to see one of them soon file bankruptcy (Ford has all ready come close). Just look at their quarterly financial statements if you don't believe me. ALL are HEAVILY in the red, and their future guidance looks very weak.
Jun 5, 2008 at 3:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
I would point out that the plant in Canada that GM slated to close along with Janesville has officials there offering up 250 million. So unless Doyle cuts his staff and the entire Wisconsin governing body, which would be no loss I may add, I don't see WI putting up that kind of cash. Lets face it, if the good workforce in Janesville and billions of dollars that this plant has generated in profits for GM over the years aren't enough, then GM can take their plant and their total lack of loyalty straight to bankruptcy. It's a shame bad management at the corporate level means more job losses for the loyal Janesville GM plant and its employees. I'll be shifting my lifelong loyalty to GM products to a better managed company.
Jun 4, 2008 at 9:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
I whole-heartedly agree with R1234 100%! It's also important to keep in mind that this plant closing has a trickle-down effect. There are smaller manufacturing facilities (in Janesville), for example Leer, who this is going to have a detrimentral impact on. GM is only the first plant to be laying employees off and closing it's doors. Eventually there will be many others doing the same. Where does that leave this community that once thrived? How long is it going to take us to recover from this huge loss to Janesville? Even more sickening, all we can do is sit back and watch it happen. Our government, or lack thereof, won't do a thing to help us out. They're more concerned about sending business overseas. Eventually none of us will be employed....unless we move to China!
Jun 4, 2008 at 9:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
Just because the plant closes, doesn't mean GM doesn't own it anymore. Can't tear down someone else's property without compensation...
Jun 4, 2008 at 3:22 p.m.
Suggest removal
Now is the time to put a lot of pressure on the government and elected officials. That is if they want to keep THEIR jobs. In addition, I have felt for years that since I don't get to approve my pay raise elected officials shouldn't be able to raise theirs either. If they want a pay hike it should be a referendum and let their 'employers' make that decision. Heck, if I could just decide to give myself a raise, I'd be livin on high hog!
Jun 4, 2008 at 1:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Well put R1234
Jun 4, 2008 at 1:38 p.m.
Jun 4, 2008 at 1:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
After reading the blogs regarding the GM closing and listening to everyone, including our Governor and his vow to work with GM to try to get them to stay, my opinions differ and so I choose to make my remarks here....right under Governor Doyle's nose.
GM has been posturing for years to get out of America. GM and other large companies rape the US taxpayer and its workforce taking charity in the form of tax benefits for the companies and loopholes so that they can function with great profits for their shareholders as well as obscene salaries for their CEO's who work from day one to undercut the rank and file employee to boost their bottom line. GM and other industries will squat when the time is right and leave communities in dire straights unable to recover for years.
It has been done by GM in many communities across this nation. Where were Governor Thompson and Governor Doyle? Are they blind to national financial news?
Our Governors have neglected all of Wisconsin with the exception of Madison. When new, high paying jobs come into Wisconsin, they are located in Madison. Madison is the showcase for Wisconsin. In the last 15 years, nothing major has been brought to Janesville or Rock County. Rock is bleeding more each day as more companies close or cut back. As all this bleeding has taken place, Janesville has been preoccupied with parks and recreational facilities and they have not been preparing for the future. I-90 is perfect for development of a technological and research corridor for the state of Wisconsin. We have an active University engaged in research which could attract many related businesses in the research field of medicine and genetics, gerontology, etc. but it is all housed in Madison. Madison is not being developed south but in other directions. We could have a thriving and bustling economy if it would spread south along I-90 straight to the WI-IL border, thereby, strengthening all the communities south of Madison. It's time for the Governor to share the wealth and spread it all around. We all pay taxes to the State of Wisconsin but Madison appears to benefit most. It is sad to see Janesville decline and there is no time to waste pandering to the likes of GM. Our future is here now and we must demand value from our Governor and our representatives for our tax dollar and our vote more now than ever before; we do have power with our votes. As we lose jobs, maybe our elected officials should lose theirs, or take a pay cut, or maybe even have their benefits cut. What a concept!!!
Jun 4, 2008 at 12:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
Gov Doyle:
Symbolism over substance. The choice to close or to keep open the Janesville plant resides in Detroit, not madison. However, in order to pander for votes for another term, this looks good. At the end of the day, the state will not go out of business, but GM is gone.
How ironic would it be if Doyle took a trip to Japan and convinced Toyota to buy the GM property and build non union cars in Janesville. Wait-----Wisconsin is a forced union state, Toyota will not relocate to Janesville even if GM gave the land to Toyota.
Hopefully the UAW will deliver the vote to Obama, maybe Obama will come back and give a speech telling those about to lose their jobs that everything will be Okay. A nice speech will help, wont it?
Jun 4, 2008 at 12:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
Long time gone, I understand your sentiment and anger at GM for this move, and to take down the building, but wait a minute...
The GM plant location at the crossroads of two active rail lines gives it a leg up on the new direction of US transportation...trains. Due to peak oil and global warming, both freight and passenger rail are making a comeback since they are far more efficient than road-based transport. Why not investigate the possibility of using the plant to manufacture rail equipment? The plant location at a rail crossroads means that the infrastructure is there for shipping out the equipment. Why waste this great opportunity? And we can keep the manufacturing here!
Jun 4, 2008 at 11:45 a.m.
Suggest removal
Forget the "american made" motto....and beg another car company to move into the GM plant in Janesvill. That is the only way I can see Doyle helping....what else can he do? Bullying won't work....GM can do what they want to unfortuneately. Most cars are heinz 57 anyway....American Made doesn't exist anymore anyway.
Jun 4, 2008 at 11:11 a.m.
Suggest removal
With minimal effort one can look back and find
which plants were the most vuenerable.
Want to guess which plant top those lists?
GM is not going to change its mind.I would hope
Doyle and others are already starting to put all there efforts in helping the people that work there.
Because as the May sales went for the autos that are made here,theres no way this plant is going to be open until 2010.
Jun 4, 2008 at 10:42 a.m.
Suggest removal
I heard the State did know of this and GM's plans to potentially build a NEW plant in Southern Wisconsin sine the current site is "unretoolable". My understanding is that the State was unwilling to negotiate price, tax, etc.., with GM corporate. Of course this is all second hand information, but I trust the Union source who told me.
Jun 4, 2008 at 10:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
Governor Doyle, call Governor Tommy, and read the playbook for keeping Chrysler in my area, Kenosha. It does not work. Do it differently.
*
Make plans to bulldoze GM now - don't leave it as a scar on the community like Kenosha did.
*
When the last assembler walks out the plant doors either in 2009 or 2010, the state should have jackhammers, sledges and crowbars waiting and those 2,600 good men and women should march right back in and take the building down.
*
Make way for a new future.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.