Milton schools look at saving money and saving the earth

By STACY VOGEL ( Contact )   Thursday, July 10, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Podcast Episode


Kyle Geissler talks with Janesville Gazette reporter Stacy Vogel about environmentally-friendly options included in plans for a new high school in Milton.

RSS   

— There's no question the Milton School District is interested in building an environmentally friendly high school, district leaders say.

But how do you balance protecting the environment with protecting the taxpayers?

Plunkett Raysich Architects and Miron Construction presented the Milton High School Design Team with a number of "green" options for the proposed new building.

Monday, the design team will make its recommendations to the school board. Those recommendations will include at least two green options, said Bill Wilson, design team chairman.

From the beginning, the design team showed an interest in geothermal technology, he said. Geothermal systems use buried pipes as a heat source or a heat sink, depending on the season, to control building temperatures.

A geothermal system would add about $1.4 million onto the estimated $68 million price for a new high school, but the district could recoup its costs in energy savings in as little as eight years, according to a report from the architects.

The design team toured several schools with geothermal systems, from Fond du Lac High School—the first public high school in the state with geothermal—to newer schools, Wilson said.

"It's a technology that has matured," he said. "It's not chancy at all. And with rising energy costs, even the payback times that we've seen will get shorter."

The design team will recommend the district include a geothermal system in its high school design, Wilson said.

It also will recommend the district reserve part of the roof for a garden at a cost of about $210,000 above the base roof cost, Wilson said. That was the least expensive in several green roof options the architects presented.

The basic design also includes environmentally friendly elements such as natural light. The design even includes a central courtyard to provide more windows to classrooms.

Some have worried that extra windows will let heat escape, but some modern windows can trap heat better than walls, Wilson said.

Studies show students learn better with natural light in the classroom, he said.

Rob Roy, president of the Milton School Board, said the board hasn't yet had much discussion about green options because it hasn't heard the design team's recommendations.

But the board expressed interest in green technology when choosing an architect. The district already chooses energy-efficient windows and heating systems for its existing buildings, Roy said.

"We know that you might have to spend a little bit up front to get a long-term savings, but if you can save money over the long term for the district, that's a wise thing to do," he said.

The school district also has a responsibility to set an example in caring for the environment, Wilson said.

"If we're teaching our kids to care about the environment, it's pretty important for the adults who are spending the money to spend money on responsible things," he said.

IF YOU GO

What: Milton School Board meeting. The Milton High School Design Team will make its recommendations to the school board.

When: 6:30 p.m. Monday.

Where: Milton High School library, 114 W. High St.

NEW HIGH SCHOOL STILL UP FOR DEBATE

The Milton High School Design Team on Monday will present the results of eight months of work when offers recommendations for a new school.

But the question of when and if the district will build the school remains murky.

When the school board voted to move forward on plans for a new high school in August, the district was growing at a rate of 100 students a year and projected even faster growth in coming years.

But since then, two major housing projects in the district have stalled. Economic woes, including last month’s news that the General Motors plant in Janesville will close by the end of 2010, have added to fears the district won’t grow fast enough to fill a new school.

School board members told The Janesville Gazette in June that a referendum won’t take place until at least spring, and possibly later. They said the district has to wait and see how the loss of GM and other local jobs affects the community.

But several said they still believe the district will need a new building in coming years. And the longer the district waits to build, the more expensive construction will be, they said.

GREEN OPTIONS

Plunkett Raysich Architects and Miron Construction presented several “green” options for a new high school to the Milton High School Design Team.

Miron Construction is working on estimates of how long it would take the district to pay off each element and hopes to have the estimates ready for Monday’s meeting, said Craig Uhlenbrauck, Miron vice president of marketing.

Here are the options, what they cost and what they do.

Roof

Base roof: Black membrane roof, $2 million.

White roof:

-- Additional cost: $315,000.

-- What it is: A white roof is a white coating put over the roof, said Theresa Lehman, Miron director of sustainable services. The coating makes the roof reflect heat instead of absorbing it, keeping the building cooler in the summer.

A white roof could be a good idea for a high school because it tends to be used year-round, Lehman said. The roof also can help control temperatures in the winter because equipment, body heat and lights often make a building too warm even in winter.

Garden roof:

-- Additional cost: $6.6 million for the entire roof; $210,000 for a 10,000-square-foot portion.

-- What it is: There are several types of garden roofs, but the one recommended here would be a roof covered by trays of plants, Lehman said. The plants absorb heat and storm water, cooling the building and reducing the need for storm water management.

Because covering the entire roof with a garden is so expensive, the construction company also offered a partial option. In that option, the garden roof probably would serve more as an educational tool than a cooling agent, Uhlenbrauck said.

Heating and air conditioning

Base system: A high-performance conventional system, $6.2 million.

Geothermal:

-- Additional cost: $1.4 million.

-- What it is: Geothermal uses liquid to draw heat or cool air from the earth. Depending on the soil, building materials and energy costs, it can pay for itself in eight to 16 years, Lehman said. The company hopes to have a more precise estimate for Monday’s meeting.

Because geothermal is a renewable energy source, the district might be eligible for grants to help pay for the system, Lehman said.

Ice storage:

-- Additional cost: $177,000.

-- What it is: Ice storage shifts a building’s peak energy use from daytime to nighttime, when utilities charge cheaper rates. Basically, the system creates a block of ice at night that is used to cool the building during the day. Like the white roof, ice storage benefits a building more in the summer than in the winter.

If the district chooses to install a geothermal system, it probably wouldn’t install an ice storage system, Uhlenbrauck said.

Pool

Base system: Standard boiler to heat pool water, $30,000.

Solar heating system:

-- Additional cost: $268,000.

-- What it is: A solar system would collect energy from the sun to heat the pool water. Again, the system probably wouldn’t be necessary if the district goes with a geothermal system, Uhlenbrauck said.







reader COMMENTS (9)
sluggo
Jul 11, 2008 at 9:42 a.m.
Suggest removal

balance, the answer is no because they are to worried about building these gigantic gyms instead of saving money on energy costs

draxtery
Jul 11, 2008 at 7:28 a.m.
Suggest removal

What difference does it make the referendum will never pass.

etown
Jul 11, 2008 at 7:03 a.m.
Suggest removal

if they want a good example of a green building they should tour the tri-north builders building in madison it amazing how this building turned out

ktaustin
Jul 10, 2008 at 8:22 p.m.
Suggest removal

"Green roofs are a big part of Chicago. They help control rain water run off and control the urban heat Island."

Sounds promising. Does this mean I have to mow my roof? (joking) If it reduces the urban heat island effect then I guess it would reduce the measured global warming trend at least.

"and yes, the planet does need saving if humans are to continue to live here."

Even if you believe all the doom and gloom from global warming (whops, I forgot it's called climate change now to be more inclusive), humans will still thrive on this planet. Perhaps the population increase would stall, or backpedal slightly, but it's not like the majority of the population is going to starve. Just keeping a little perspective.

BalancePoint
Jul 10, 2008 at 7:40 p.m.
Suggest removal

Evansville High School was built over 5 years ago with geothermal heating and cooling. Three months ago, when I contacted the Jvl School District, to see if we are incorporating "green" energy into Craig and Parker renovations - geothermal heating and cooling, the answer was "no". I don't understand why Janesville is always 20+ years behind everyone else - with the uncertainty of oil for fuel - geothermal is a no-brainer. Call your school board members and ask them why this wasn't looked at.... maybe the gym space would've had to have been smaller or something - if it is sports related, this town will spend the money on it - but not to save the planet, and yes, the planet does need saving if humans are to continue to live here.

tnimmo89
Jul 10, 2008 at 6:21 p.m.
Suggest removal

What a great artical! Such a good idea too, to have a "green school"! It makes perfect sense, and if such technology is avaialbe to us today, I feel we should take full advantage of it. I truely hope the tax payers will over look the midly high expensees of going "green" and look at the greater good, for thier community and their environment. It would of been nice to see Craig and Parker go green in ways too.

nowind
Jul 10, 2008 at 1:09 p.m.
Suggest removal

Green roofs are a big part of Chicago. They help control rain water run off and control the urban heat Island. I don't think Milton has a big urban heat Island problem. At the most, they should only consider a portion for educational purposes.

ktaustin
Jul 10, 2008 at 12:22 p.m.
Suggest removal

I agree, "saving the planet" has nothing to do with it, it's about saving money. The planet doesn't need any saving; even if the ecosystem changes completely and humans struggle, "mother nature" will do just fine adapting to any condition. It's really about the selfish motive to preserve (or improve) those parts of the planet that are benefitial to humans.

I also commend the district for considering some of these options (not that I think all of them are worthwhile). The garden on the roof is one I had never heard of before. I must say though I'm a little skeptical about the comment that some windows can keep heat in better than walls... maybe if you're comparing cheap drywall with little insulation to the latest most expensive window models.

nowind
Jul 10, 2008 at 11:25 a.m.
Suggest removal

It is always nice to try and sell these options as saving the earth. And there is no reason this will not help.
But the real sell is the overall operation budget savings this kind of "Green" technology will provide the school.
With Geothermal and proper daylighting controls alone you will be able to drastically reduce the operating budget of the school. Not only will you be reducing the operating budget but you will be preventing spikes in future years from jumps in energy costs.
This will allow the school to put that operating money into teacher’s salaries and supplies for the students.
Anyone who doesn't think energy cost will continue to rise quickly needs to get there head out of the oil drum.
*
Good for Milton for considering these options.
*
Light every building with daylight, heat and cool every building with the earth.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT