Proposed rule would disenfranchise voters, cause election chaos
The League of Women Voters believes voting is a fundamental right that must be guaranteed to every eligible citizen and that election administration should be efficient and well coordinated. The Government Accountability Board (GAB) is considering for the second time a proposed emergency rule that threatens both voting rights and smooth election administration.
The GAB in July decided not to adopt a rule that would have prevented voters from casting a regular ballot, and having that ballot count, if there is no “complete match” between the voter’s ID information on the voter registration list and other government databases. An “unmatched” voter would only be eligible to cast a provisional ballot, which would not be counted unless the voter presents proof of residence to election officials by 4 p.m. the next day.
The GAB decided against adopting the proposed rule before the fall elections, in part because no one knows how extensive the mismatching between the various state databases is. All kinds of discrepancies can trip it up, including misspellings, use of nicknames, hyphenated or double last names, middle names and initials, first names that look like last names and vice versa. However, the Republican Party has asked the GAB to reconsider its position.
Wisconsin’s system of open and clean elections has resulted in very few problems through the years. Requiring thousands of voters whose names are tagged as a “nonmatch” to cast a provisional ballot will wreak havoc on our system. It could make Wisconsin “this year’s Ohio.”
Besides, it is unfair. Voters who use provisional ballots must bring their ID or proof of residence document to the clerk’s office by the day after the election in order for their vote to be counted. Asking voters to do that at this fall’s elections will result in many people disenfranchised simply because the matching system is still unproven. As with other restrictive measures, the burden would fall disproportionately on the people for whom it would be most difficult to get to the clerk’s office, that is, the elderly, disabled, low-income and/or minority people.
The League of Women Voters of Wisconsin opposes this emergency rule, which would disenfranchise voters and foul up election administration. Now that the matching software is up and running, the GAB chose wisely to address the matching issue by crosschecking new registrations as they come in. It is important to note that a nonmatch doesn’t mean the registration is invalid or fraudulent. It might mean that there is a problem with the name and address, which might have been mistyped when entered into the system by a busy human being.
Through use of the statewide voter registration system in the fall elections, the GAB will gather data on how extensive the mismatches are, and they will address those after the election. That is a better time to work out the bugs in the software, so they don’t interfere with the right of eligible Wisconsin citizens to cast a vote and have it counted.
Andrea Kaminski is executive director of the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin Education Fund. The league is a nonpartisan political organization that promotes informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and advocacy. Kaminski can be reached at (608) 256-0827 or kaminski@lwvwi.org.
Sep 7, 2008 at 11:51 a.m.
Suggest removal
THE REPULICANS CHEATED NOT THE DEMS
Sep 2, 2008 at 7:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
The only ones against it are the Dems. because they can't cheat, everyone knows they cheated to win the last two Presidential Elections.
Why is it only Dems. that will be affected there are lots of old men and women Republicans that supposedly won't be able to vote with an I.D. man up libs admit you can't win without the 5% paid voters in Milwaukee, Racine, Kenosha areas.
Aug 27, 2008 at 12:07 p.m.
Suggest removal
Whybesad: Thanks for the link. Seeing that it is a 67-page report, it will take me time to get back to you about it.
Aug 27, 2008 at 10:11 a.m.
Suggest removal
I've got no problem requiring an ID to vote, but lets give the system a run on a small election with low voter turn out. One of the statewide spring primaries perhaps. It makes no sense to risk fouling up the largest voter turn out in four years and becoming a laughing stock like Florida or Ohio. In business, when you make a change to a critical procedure, you generally start small and work out any bugs before you roll out the change to the whole system. To do otherwise is risky.
Aug 27, 2008 at 9:39 a.m.
Suggest removal
It is broken right here in Wisconsin here is a link to the Milwaukee Police Department special investigation on voter fraud from the 2004 elections.
http://media2.620wtmj.com/breakingnews/E...
Aug 27, 2008 at 9:35 a.m.
Suggest removal
Whats wrong with showing someone that you are actually that person. Sounds pretty simple. You have to show who you are to rent a movie.
Aug 27, 2008 at 8:55 a.m.
Suggest removal
Anyone who votes, registered to do so at some point in time using some form of ID! At THAT time, they had to show valid ID whether it was a driver's license, a utility bill, or other "official" ID as outlined in existing statutes. To create a requirement that there must be MORE voter ID at the polls is simply redundant.
Aug 27, 2008 at 8:25 a.m.
Suggest removal
I do not know about this emergency rule but not having to show some form of ID is just crazy!
Aug 27, 2008 at 3:12 a.m.
Suggest removal
SarahB. To correct you the "GOP" has been wanting to get this passed and in place long before November.
Aug 26, 2008 at 4:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
I back the League of Women Voters on this one. Why fix it if it isn't broken! Oh, yes, and of course the Republican Party would like the new policy to take effect before November. Give me a break. The GAB sounds like a waste of taxpayer money.
Aug 26, 2008 at 3:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
Governor Doyle vetoed the voter ID bill because he said it would disenfranchise the elderly. Right after that he signed a bill that required ID to buy cold medicine. I guess he didn't want the elderly to buy cold medicine anymore.
Aug 26, 2008 at 1:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
The people who oppose voter ID are generally the ones benefitting from the voter fraud. They claim that producing and ID is a hardship. Even when those in favor of voter ID have offered to provide ID's free of charge - the process of having to go get the ID was somehow too burdensome. Yet these people who cannot go get a free ID are still able to get to the polls to vote!
Aug 26, 2008 at 12:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
Please explain to me how can anybody function in today’s society without a valid photo ID! Just a few examples try to cash a check at a bank, buy alcohol (some store card regardless of age), travel on a plane, write a check at the local 'box' store. Basically just to function in life you need a photo ID. Show even one person who does not have a photo ID and I will be surprised. I believe that my vote is disenfranchised by the illegal votes that occur. Example look at the documented illegal voting that occurs every election just in Milwaukee!
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.