Commission OKs plan for downtown BID

By JIM LEUTE ( Contact )   Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— One speaker likened a proposed Business Improvement District to a train that will carry downtown Janesville and its supporters to a revitalized city center that’s been missing from the community’s landscape for decades.

Members of Janesville’s Plan Commission agreed Monday, voting overwhelmingly in support of the BID that is on track to start operations in January.

Members Steve Werner, Meridith Helgerson, Lori Hanewold, Kathy Voskuil and Nancy Zolidas voted in favor of the BID, while members Tom McDonald and Anda O’Connell, abstained over conflicts of interest.

The vote followed a public hearing in which 23 people spoke. Just more than half favored the BID, which would assess commercial, manufacturing and mixed-use properties at $2.80 per $1,000 of assessed valuation. The minimum assessment would be $275, while the maximum would be $3,500.

Opponents still have two opportunities to derail the BID.

By state statute, the BID is defeated if an opposition petition is signed by owners of properties representing more than 40 percent of the value of the property to be assessed in the district. That happened to a similar BID proposal in 2003.

If that doesn’t happen within 30 days, the city council will have the final say when it votes on the BID at its Monday, Sept. 22, meeting.

If approved, the BID would have a first-year budget of $199,500, of which $118,000 would come from property assessments and the remainder from city coffers.

The budget would target:

-- $21,700 for beautification and maintenance.

-- $30,000 for recruiting new downtown tenants and professional marketing.

-- $17,800 for events and celebrations, including an annual downtown event that would become a tradition.

-- $50,000 for signs to direct people downtown and landscaping.

-- $80,000 for personnel, rent and expenses.

Everyone who spoke Monday expressed his or her interest in the revitalization of downtown Janesville.

But several voiced opposition to the formation of a BID, citing “smoke and mirrors” in the proposed budget, a downtown drug and panhandling problem that a BID won’t solve and an unfair assessment procedure.

Christine Wilke of Wilke Chiropractic and Leo Sokolik of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers said they’ve invested and maintained their buildings without any help—or assessments.

“For anyone to imply that those who oppose this are somehow not in support of the downtown is unfair and unjust,” Wilke said.

Dave Abrahamson, who owns Bee Line Alignment on Water Street, agreed that the BID wouldn’t be perfect for every property owner.

“But it’s absolutely got to be fair,” he said.

Morris Olsen, who owns Denny’s Auto Center on West Milwaukee Street, said the timing for the BID is wrong, primarily because of the economic uncertainties the community faces.

“The handful of people that want this have the (property) value,” he said. “Us small people can’t do much about it.

“We pay more; they pay less.”

Olsen suggested that a BID would be better funded without minimum and maximum assessments.

BID task force members have said the bell curve to fund the BID is balanced. The owners of the five properties with the highest assessments will contribute 14 percent of the budget, while the 68 properties assessed at the minimum will add 15 percent.

Bill Sodemann, who owns Phones Plus on West Milwaukee, said he’s not opposed to funding to improve the downtown, but the process is un-American. He noted that one property owner can start the BID process, but it takes 40 percent of the assessed property value to stop it.

“It’s legal, but it doesn’t mean it’s the proper thing to do,” he said.

Pete Kealey, who owns two properties downtown, said the area needs a strong, unified voice to move forward.

“This is not the pet project of a few people,” he said.

Mark Cullen, chairman of J.P. Cullen & Sons, said his company has done construction work in several cities that have implemented BIDs.

“You can always tell you’re in a different kind of community when you’re in a BID downtown,” he said.

Jim Alverson, who also owns several properties downtown, said the downtown is moving in the right direction, thanks to a dedicated legion of volunteers and investors who eventually burn out. The BID, he said, will amplify those efforts.







reader COMMENTS (6)
janesvillean
Aug 19, 2008 at 5:32 p.m.
Suggest removal

This is obviously a necessary step forward if we want to execute the city's goals of having a vibrant downtown with a broad mix of service and retail businesses. A BID -- something that is in place in 82 other Wisconsin municipalities -- will promote the area and underwrite upkeep of the common areas.
.
Businesses in the mall understand that their lease money goes to advertising and improvements. Malls need rejuvenation every 10-15 years, or they stagnate and fail.
.
Similarly, a downtown is a living thing that reflects and changes with its community. Commenters (in this and other articles) seem to be saying "I fed the cat once ..." Obviously the cat needs food and water on a regular basis.
.
We have made great progress with the comprehensive plans for the city and downtown. Yes, this has been done before. But that was a while ago. It's time to take the positive things that have been happening, from the Armory and Monterey Hotel to the Helgesen building and JPAC, and use them as a catalyst for more improvements.
.
Otherwise, yeah, we may as well give up. Janesville's dead. The new downtown is the "strip". Stick a fork in it. And somebody close the door on the way out please.

happycamper
Aug 19, 2008 at 2:06 p.m.
Suggest removal

Unfortunatly someone has to pay but, a step in the right direction.

Cracker
Aug 19, 2008 at 12:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

We need some good investigative reporting in Janesville. What is the driving force behind all of these downtown initiatives? Who stands to gain the most? I already know the tax payers stand to lose the most.

Pwrtrip
Aug 19, 2008 at 11:47 a.m.
Suggest removal

Yea, I dont understand what these "revitalization projects" could consist of?? You think they would lower taxes down there so more bussinesses are inspired to move there....not drive them out. Janesville needs to accept...downtown is old, Milton ave is the new business area now....uptown. Places have little to no parking downtown. Everything moved up...the city grew. Out with the old and in with the new. Accept it and leave it be.

lakennedy
Aug 19, 2008 at 9:54 a.m.
Suggest removal

Not even just "sinking money into it", but forcing the business owners who aren't interested to pay up to an extra $3,500. I'd be furious.

Walker
Aug 19, 2008 at 9:52 a.m.
Suggest removal

A home security salesman came to our home last week. His car plates said Utah. One of the first things that came out of his mouth was "were we concerned about all the crime coming from our downtown into our non-downtown neighborhood?" He probably used that line at every house he went to here in town.

Image is everything I guess. You can make it beautiful, you can make it clean, and add some more landscaping. Have a yearly party down there. The marketing of the downtown, to me its a lost cause. Our "city center" is actually a few miles towards the north-east of downtown Janesville.

Downtown- Just why is it so important so some people to "revitalize" this? The downtown is what it is. Some restaurants, stores, banks, lawyers, and few businesses. Same as the north-east part of the city. Only its downtown. People who wish to go there, do. People who don't wish to go there, don't. Why keep sinking money into it?

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT