Croaking Canaries
When even Democratic politicians start warming to the idea of building new nuclear power plants, which have banned from Wisconsin since 1983, our canaries could start croaking any day.
Coal miners used to take canaries into the mines to warn them of danger. Canaries were highly sensitive to poisonous build-ups of carbon monoxide. When the canaries started toppling over with little Xs over their eyes, miners knew to scramble for their lives.
Surprisingly, Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle embraced a task force recommendation to modify the ban on new nuclear plants approved by voters statewide 25 years ago.
When we hear somebody suggesting we reconsider our prescient decision to curtail nuclear power, it’s usually some cartoon villain like Mr. Burns on The Simpsons or Vice President Dick Cheney.
Doyle sounded almost Cheneyian when he suggested those who refused to consider nuclear power were burying their heads in the sand.
It’s certainly true that our world has changed a lot since voters approved the ban on new nuclear plants 25 years ago. But what Doyle didn’t say was that the most dramatic changes have made proliferation of nuclear power even more frightening.
When Wisconsin voters approved the nuclear moratorium in 1983, the world did not yet have the example of the Chernobyl nuclear accident of 1986. But that cataclysmic event sure made us look smart.
The largest release of radioactivity from a nuclear power plant in history turned an area of the Ukraine once considered the breadbasket of the Soviet Union into a wasteland that now goes by far grimmer nicknames such as the “Dead Zone” and the “Zone of Alienation.”
Not only that, but the plume of radioactive fallout, 30 to 40 times that released by the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, eventually drifted over most of Europe and even eastern parts of North America.
The other major world event since 1983, of course, was 9/11. Along with everything else that changed after that momentous event was increased awareness of all the deadly dangers around us.
That is made even more frightening because of one thing that absolutely has not changed in the quarter of a century since Wisconsin approved the moratorium on new nuclear plants.
As Wisconsin wisely decreed in 1983, new nuclear plants should not be built until there is a national or international disposal site where the deadly, radioactive waste the plants generate can be safely stored.
Guess what? Twenty-five years later, there still isn’t. The Bush administration has attempted to turn Yucca Mountain in Nevada into a nuclear waste dump, but legal battles and geological questions make the site increasingly unlikely.
As difficult as it’s been to secure a disposal site, that’s just the beginning. The idea of transporting deadly, nuclear waste from all over the country, through our towns and cities and countryside, certainly would require far more careful planning and competence than the current administration has ever demonstrated.
The development of nuclear power always has required a shocking human arrogance and lack of concern about the near impossibility of protecting future generations from growing stockpiles of radioactive nuclear waste that remain deadly for hundreds of thousands of years.
The age of terrorism has multiplied every danger. The nuclear by-product of plutonium can be easily converted into handy-dandy nuclear weapons by sinister movements or whacked-out individuals bent on destroying human life.
It’s been so long since we’ve actually had to worry about building new nuclear plants, many people today have never heard of Three Mile Island or the Academy Award winning film, The China Syndrome, or the compelling, non-fiction book by journalist John Fuller, We Almost Lost Detroit.
It’s not surprising to hear Republican presidential candidate John McCain promise millionaire executives 45 new nuclear plants after he gets done personally drilling all of our nation’s beaches for oil.
But we’ve counted on Doyle and the Democratic state Senate to protect us from Assembly Republicans, who voted earlier this year to lift the nuclear moratorium.
If Doyle’s gone over to the dark side, we may have to start giving our canaries CPR any day now.
Aug 13, 2008 at 8:12 a.m.
Suggest removal
usaret, For people like ENOUGH, and Joel it will never be safe enough.
Aug 12, 2008 at 4:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
Hydroelectic Power--Can't use because it blocks the fish from doing their fishy things.
Wood Burning--Can't because it depletes the forest and some animal may cease to exist.
Wind Power--Not in my back yard--Too noisy--kills birds--blocks my view--ugly.
Nuclear--not safe even after 20+ yrs technology improvements.
Solar--Sunshines only in day time.
Oil--Can't drill because it will make the rich richer.
Coal-- Too dirty, fouls up the air.
Conserve--You conserve I'll think about it attitude.
Looks like we are down to harnessing the power of the little hamsters in their cages-provided PETA will allow it>
Other then that, someday we just might wake up to a very dark and cold world. What then?
Aug 12, 2008 at 3:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
Reading International papers to inform the uniformed. Last month two of Frances Power plants where discovered to be leaking. If you call that safe you don't think much of what the next generation will inherit from us. Nuclear Power Plants are still not safe. Only Republicans like Ryan and Mc Cain are in favor of this polluting form of energy.
Aug 12, 2008 at 8:36 a.m.
Suggest removal
When Joel says "It’s not surprising to hear Republican presidential candidate John McCain promise millionaire executives 45 new nuclear plants after he gets done personally drilling all of our nation’s beaches for oil." He really is saying it's ok to pay $5 plus for gas and double your home heating costs. Even the French know nuclear power is safe and no drilling on Ted Kennedy's beach.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.