Mayo loses appeal for fourth time
MADISON Convicted murderer Jody Mayo has lost another appeal seeking a new trial.
The ruling Thursday by a state appeals court is the fourth such finding since the Janesville woman was convicted 24 years ago.
Mayo, 45, and Michelle Lambert are serving life sentences for the 1981 murder of Randy Bleiler. He was found beaten and stabbed to death in a McKinley Street apartment where he was babysitting children of a friend.
Mayo has argued that she deserves a new trial because Lambert told numerous people at Taycheedah Correctional Institution that she alone killed Bleiler.
Mayo’s appeal based on that argument was rejected in 2000 by the Fourth District Court of Appeals.
Mayo and her attorney, public defender Bill Schmaal, filed a new appeal in 2007.
One of the reasons for the new appeal, Schmaal explained at the time, is that since 2000, the state Supreme Court issued a new pronouncement about a key aspect of Mayo's argument—that Lambert's statements to different people essentially corroborate each other.
One reason the appellate court gave for rejecting Mayo's appeal in 2000 was that Lambert's statements to staff at the women's prison had to be corroborated by some other, independent source or by new evidence.
But the Supreme Court has since pronounced that it has always been Wisconsin law that the same statements made by one person to several people could corroborate each other, Schmaal said.
Citing the Supreme Court ruling, Mayo and Schmaal launched the new appeal.
Rock County Judge Alan Bates in July 2007 rejected their arguments, writing that the Supreme Court pronouncement on corroboration doesn't apply in Mayo's case because it concerned hearsay evidence, not a recantation.
Schmaal and Mayo disagreed with Bates’ ruling and appealed to the Fourth District Court of Appeals.
The appeals court Thursday ruled against them again.
Schmaal said Thursday he hadn’t had time to absorb the opinion or confer with Mayo regarding the possibility of appealing to the state Supreme Court.

May 9, 2009 at 11:24 a.m.
Suggest removal
I'm a bit confused with the person you people are Sainting with the Bleiler I knew. He was a married man with children when he met Michelle and started a relationship that ultimately ruined her life. I personally witnessed a 17 year old Michelle, 7 months pregnant with Bleiler's child, having the crap beat out of her by Bleiler, for not taking a handful of assorted drugs that he ordered her to take.
Bleiler had Michelle convinced that he was Christ. You people have no idea of how horribly he messed her up, all through drugs and mind games.
Michelle was my best friend for years. I keep her in my heart and in my prayers. She needs to be paroled. She should have been paroled with therapy after 7 years. Men don't usually serve the sentances that women have to for the same crimes, they serve less time.
This whole story of "Poor Randy" is nothing but a crock. The man was nothing but a slime bag.
Apr 7, 2009 at 12:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
you all need to think about what this had and has done to the family and those it hurt the most, I do not care if she says that she did not do it or not. The point is no matter what she knows who was all there and for why it all went down..........
Aug 19, 2008 at 2:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
No, Wisconsin does not have the death penalty. How many people should have gotten the death penalty for crimes they were committed of, and later found innocent for??? I think a lot of you would change your tune if it were your family member we were talking about here, and you believed they were innocent. Was this woman convicted solely on the testimony of the other assailant and not by any direct evidence?
Aug 19, 2008 at 10:50 a.m.
Suggest removal
Pretty sure Wisconsin doesn't have the death penalty.
Aug 19, 2008 at 10:50 a.m.
Suggest removal
It is probably because Wisconsin doesn't have the death penalty.
Aug 19, 2008 at 10:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
I lived by Michelle and Randy Bleiler, they lived in our neighborhood. Michelle was always a little strange, I guess I was kind of afraid of her, she was mean. I remember when this happened, I was only 18, but to this day I remember it well. I never understood why they didn't get the death penalty. They should atleast die in prison. No one knows what Randy could have become or done with his life, it was taken from him and theirs should be too.
Aug 9, 2008 at 10:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
Only two people know for sure if she was involved in that crime, but if she wasn't then she has spent the past 24 years paying for a crime she did not commit. 24 years away from her family for a crime she did not commit.
Justmy414 hit it right on the head - a lot of people have spent years locked away for crimes they were later proven NOT to have commited.
Aug 8, 2008 at 8:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
Guess what the number 219 means? 219 people convicted and imprisoned for crimes it was later determined, many by DNA, that they absolutely did not do. Imagine for just one minute, this co-defendant was trying to save her own skin at the trial and lied about Mayo's involvment. Now maybe she decides, I should really tell the truth since I can't live with the guilt anymore and begins telling everyone she has contact with, I did it alone and she wasn't involved. I hope that those of you deciding just what should happen realize that you don't really know what happened. After all, the police and district attorney were all just positive that the family of Jon Benet Ramesy killed her for year, after year, after year. Oh, until they discovered they were wrong.
Aug 8, 2008 at 7:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
I lived, and my family still does, just down the street from where this happened. They demolished that house, of course. I wish the prosecution had been more definitive. Given the different stories that were told and the botched first trials, I just hope the second time around it really was right.
Aug 8, 2008 at 6:20 p.m.
Suggest removal
Randy was a close friend of my older brothers and sisters, I was young then too. I do remember the deep sadness and intense anger felt by so many in our close knit neighborhood.
In my opinion they don't deserve life in prison, they deserve to die the way he did.
Aug 8, 2008 at 3:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
I remember the trial and the news coverage. I remember the details your talking about, packerfan, and they both do deserve life sentences.
Freaks.
Aug 8, 2008 at 2:13 p.m.
Suggest removal
A life sentence should be a LIFE sentence. I was young when they killed Randy. I still remember going to the funeral. No parent should have to go through what his family went through. And a fourth appeal!?! Enough is enough! There needs to be truth in sentencing!
Aug 8, 2008 at 12:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
Those two did more than beat and stab Randy to death. I`m not getting into details, but it was horrific. I hope both women NEVER get out again!
Aug 8, 2008 at 11:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
I went to the court house the day they showed pictures. Both of these women deserve to rot in prison. Life should really mean life in this case.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.