Eyesore or historic building?
JANESVILLE One man’s eyesore is another’s historical gas station.
“I think it’s a blighted building sitting next to the city’s police station,” City Manager Steve Sheiffer said Monday.
Karl Dommershausen, a local appraiser, disagreed.
“It’s probably one of the last historic examples of a filling station in this country,” he told the Janesville City Council. “And it’s right next door.”
In the middle of the debate is the old gas station at 101 N. Franklin St.
The city proposes spending $152,000 in tax incremental finance funds to buy the property—now an auto repair shop—test it for environmental hazards and raze the building for green space.
But more people have stepped forward to protest the demolition of what they say is a World War II-era filling station.
Wisconsin Public Television recently aired a program called “Fill ’er Up: The Glory Days of Wisconsin Gas Stations.” Almost 70 Wisconsin gas stations now are listed on local, state and national registers of historic places, according to a Web page on the program.
In 2002, city staff investigated the historical value of 101 N. Franklin St. and determined it wasn’t eligible for the National Register of Historic Places due to its condition.
The Wisconsin Historical Society disagreed and said it was eligible, said Judy Adler, a city community development planner.
The Janesville Historic Commission believes the site would be perfect for a coffee shop, art gallery or visitors center, said Rich Fletcher, commission chairman.
The coffee shop idea resonated with council President George Brunner, the city’s former police chief.
“I’ve often thought it would make a beautiful coffee and doughnut shop. We could call it ‘The Precinct,’” Brunner said.
On Monday, the council authorized buying the property, 5-1, with the understanding that the demolition decision would rest with the council.
Council member Bill Truman opposed the purchase, saying the city should let the owner market the building.
The old gas station could get a second life. A group of students in the Leadership Development Academy is interested in trying to find a new use for the building.
They will have to hurry. The council likely will take another look at the building by late spring or early summer.

Nov 15, 2007 at 11:34 a.m.
Suggest removal
ame8736:
So what is your point? You're partially right, if the city cannot mow what they have, why add more? Don't you think though that the city would make sure to keep that new "green" space looking nice because of its proximity to the police station and municipal building? If that were the case, and they did not increase the mowing budget, then yes, maintenance would be at the expense of something else, and that is wrong. However, the general feel is that the building should not come down, so does the city own it or sell it? If they own it, who pays for it? I think that you would quickly find out that it costs more to have the building than cut the grass. Think about it, if you had an empty lot that you owned next to a lot you owned that had a building, which lot would cost you more to operate? That's my point. That's why I say if the city should sell the building, and the private sector, not the taxpayer is responsible then for it.
Nov 15, 2007 at 10:36 a.m.
Suggest removal
we dont have the money now to take care of our parks and mow them. my daughter lived over by adams park and would not let her son go there because of how bad the play equipment was and at times the grass was ridiculous. now they want to add more places for the city to mow?
Nov 14, 2007 at 12:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
I still hold by my views. Anyway, I just hope it stays there and gets some TLC. Cathy, I agree, Hopefully something will get done with the old jeffris theatre fiasco. And, I hope they could find somebody to do something nice with the Monterey hotel.
Nov 14, 2007 at 10:29 a.m.
Suggest removal
Yes, Optimus...the Monterey Hotel fiasco....bet nothing has been done yet by the city to start fining Graff for the nearby teardown that's beyond the already extended completion date...I suppose with the colder weather and holiday season approaching the powers that be will decide to let him slide by until spring!
Nov 14, 2007 at 10:03 a.m.
Suggest removal
I like the idea of the privatization of that property rather than have the city "take" it over. Many of you are really missing the boat when you make "the city should do something with that building vs greenspace argument" Think about it. I'm pretty sure that mowing the grass on that little site would cost the city far less than maintaining a building. That type of near-sightedness, is what causes all of our taxes to go up in the long run. Don't get me wrong, I would hate to see that building go. It does have a certain charm and character that we do NOT see in new construction now. That's why it should be sold and privatized to an individual(s) who have a solid business plan. A caveat however; just so long as it's not sold to someone who will leave it vacant and empty for years- much like the historic Monterey hotel... Ah, I digress...
Nov 14, 2007 at 9:29 a.m.
Suggest removal
Irish Mafia, Lets take up donations and start a drive to do just that! Sounds like a good idea to me!
Nov 14, 2007 at 9:24 a.m.
Suggest removal
I think making that building into a coffee shop or little take-out deli is a good idea. I even like the cop theme. LOL. If someone does decide to buy it and make it into a little place like that there could be pictures of past Janesville officers, old "wanted" posters,memorabilia collections, show re-runs of cop shows or even have a police scanner going. It could be a way to say "thanks" to the police for doing their job and have a new place to grab a bite. I know if I had the money... I'd do it myself!
Nov 14, 2007 at 8:13 a.m.
Suggest removal
I agree with the city. This building and many others have been sitting there for years with nothing done to them. If people care so much why has nothing been with it by now? How many more theator situations do we need?
Nov 13, 2007 at 6:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
I gotta also agree with Cathy's asessment of the council and the city manager. He's totally outta touch with the peoples wishes. Let someone buy the property and make use of it. Why not have the Janesville visitors bureau there! A great place. Makes sense to me.
Nov 13, 2007 at 3:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
We are loosing our identity. Go down Milton Avenue or Deerfield Drive. It's "Anywhere USA"...not Janesville. While I don't find that building all that interesting, I guarantee I wouldn't find it in "Anywhere USA"...only Janesville.
Nov 13, 2007 at 2:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
What could be more sterotypic than a coffee/donut shop next to the police station. It'll save them time from having to drive all the way out to Dunkin Donuts.
Nov 13, 2007 at 2:02 p.m.
Suggest removal
Certainly no surprise Sheiffer considers the historic bldg blighted,therefore worthless. I hope the council makes their own decision on what to do with it and disregards Sheiffer's opinion. At least with elected officials the community can help control who gets in/out of office and represent the community at large. Representing the community at large is a foreign concept to the paid manager.
Nov 13, 2007 at 1:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yup, We don't need any more green space! We have enough of that! Spend the money in that building. Its better spent. Take other money from new frivilous "water parkways and green spaces" and use it for mowing the over abundance of green space we now have.
Nov 13, 2007 at 11:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
tear down tear down spend spend spend at the council meeting last night it was decided to give money to tallman house but then no money for mowing. now they want to buy a building? spend that money on mowing the grass at the parks duh!!!!!!
Nov 13, 2007 at 11:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
The city manager is against anything he sees fit. He needs to go! I've always thought that its a buetiful old building. I 'm against demolition and feel it should get a second life. As the city council president said, A doughnut or coffee shop is the perfect idea. A business which could bring more people to the downtown area. Leave the building alone and let it take new life! There is not many old unique buildings like this left.
Nov 13, 2007 at 11:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
To demolish such an historic gem would be tragic and very short-sighted. Most Americans seem to always want "new and improved" over the insight, character, and the integrity of historic architecture of our cultural past. That usually leaves communities looking completely indistinquishable with their homogenous "big-box" eyesores. I truly hope the Council choses to re-use rather than remove. As an historic home owner...while they're at it, how about instituting TOUGHER and enforceable historic district ordinances that truly protect all historic buildings in Janesville!!!!
Nov 13, 2007 at 11:21 a.m.
Suggest removal
This would just be another GREENSPACE that we could not afford to keep up.The city could always ask for volunteers to keep it mowed I guess !
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.