Is vertical tower next breakthrough in wind power?

By MIKE HEINE   Wednesday, Dec. 26, 2007
ADVERTISEMENT
 

PhotoVideo


Adam Fuller believes his new windmill design, left, could revolutionize wind power. Fuller says his design is more efficient and rotates in even the slightest breeze.

Adam Fuller believes his new windmill design, left, could revolutionize wind power. Fuller says his design is more efficient and rotates in even the slightest breeze.

— The three blades of a traditional 120-foot wind turbine stood nearly still.

But a few yards away, Adam Fuller’s 36-foot wind tower turned silently in the breeze. The only sound came from a small chain around a sprocket—no louder than a bicycle.

Fuller, a Racine inventor who spent his life savings on the project (he is living in a motel to cut expenses), thinks he has developed a windmill design that could power the future.

“The concept is pretty basic,” Fuller said of his wind tower, which stands in Marlin Dunham’s backyard in rural East Troy. “What made sense to me is to create a design with a lot of surface area.

“That creates a more efficient machine by creating more drag on one side and an aerodynamic shape on the other side.”

Each of the eight stacked turbines has four wind scoops. The early prototype is half as tall as Fuller is permitted, but so far he is impressed. Since October, it has spun flawlessly and silently in the light breezes and sustained winds of 50 mph, he said.

“I have indications that it is going to work. It’s a good theory,” said Dunham, who powers his home and others with two traditional windmills and solar panels on his roof.

Easy energy

Fuller claims his patent-pending, all-steel design could be built for about $150,000 and pay for itself in four years with electricity savings and payments for supplying energy onto power grids.

If it ever is built to a height of 120 feet—about 50 feet higher than the 72-foot tower he is permitted now—he feels it could produce 30,000 to 75,000 kilowatt hours monthly, enough for 30 to 70 homes. Most homes use about 1,000 kWh per month.

Rational rotation

Traditional wind turbines, such as the ones proposed in Magnolia Township in Rock County, rely on wind glancing off a blade.

Fuller’s pinwheel-like design has more points of impact for the wind to strike. Even a slight breeze turns the blades and produces enough torque to spin a generator, he said.

“It’s a more efficient process. Think of a diesel engine. The load capability that a diesel engine can carry is much more than a gasoline engine, but it operates at a much lower RPM than a gasoline engine.”

Fuller thinks of himself more as an inventor than he does an environmentalist. He knew he could make the design and knows it can work.

Along the way, he realized his machine was virtually silent and harmless to birds.

The blades of traditional turbines can kill migratory birds, he said. His vertical design is a solid stack, easily avoided by birds.

“I’m going to change everything we know about alternative energy,” he said of the design.

An added benefit is having the generator at ground level, making maintenance easier. Even bearings high in the tower can be greased from the ground.

Roping the wind

Fuller hasn’t caught on yet with an investment group willing to finance mass production of his tower.

He has yet to hook up a generator to his unfinished prototype. He doesn’t have the money to buy one that can work on lower revolutions.

But he is hopeful there will be a market. He envisions thousands of “micro” wind farms with several towers on as little as 3 acres powering our future.

“I realize the situation that’s coming in 20 years, both with global warming and with current energy reserves,” he said. “It’s pretty alarming, when you do some thorough research, the situation that we’re going to be in if there isn’t some new technology introduced.”

FOR MORE INFORMATION

Interested in Fuller’s ideas? Want to become an investor? To find out more, call him at (262) 308-7948.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(4)
janesvillecomments
Dec 27, 2007 at 12:34 a.m.
Suggest removal

Perhaps a similar design was tried and failed 3000 years ago. I doubt that sheet steel and metal tubing was used when it was tried back then. Leonardo Da Vinci tried flying machines back in the 1400's. Good thing Orville and Wilbur Wright didn't take that attitude towards powered flight 500 years after Leonardo failed.

====================Paragraph===================

I'm glad someone is looking at another design for wind power. I don't mind the tall conventional towers, but they aren't appropriate for everywhere. Another neat idea I've seen are the Motorwind micro-turbines:

http://www.motorwavegroup.com/new/motorw...

http://www.motorwavegroup.com/new/motorw...

====================Paragraph===================

Maybe Fuller will give up and/or go broke, but perhaps in 5 years ABC Supply will be carrying Fuller Turbines in 3 sizes. I'm glad someone is trying something besides advocating rooting up Alaska to suck the oil out of the tundra, or burning more "clean" coal.

History101
Dec 26, 2007 at 8:41 p.m.
Suggest removal

I've build multiple traditional small wind turbines and a sync inverter that fed the grid. I wish there was a good design for vertical axis devices. The best I've seen lately is at :

http://www.datataker.com/public_domain/P...

I would do more research before proceeding.

beaufortscale5
Dec 26, 2007 at 2:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

It is sad to think someone would spend their life savings on a design that was tried and failed 3000 years ago. The history of windmill designs and government testing has proven that a drag device such as this is not effective in producing power. There is a large difference between drag and lift devices and the potential (or lack of) power they can produce. At 36 feet you are in a wind turbulence zone created by surrounding trees (based on the picture)this is not true usable wind for creating energy. Ground drag and coefficients are something you can not reinvent or redesign. They are facts based on physics. I do not live in Wisconsin but have spent many weeks in Custer attending wind energy training at the finest renewable energy association in the Midwest. I would offer Mr. Fuller to considering taking a design considerations course where the most important thing he will learn is to stop spending his life savings on a design that will not change everything we know about alternative energy and refocus his energies and talents on something that will truely work. My apologies for being so forward but someone had to say it.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT